AI vs Real-Time Events: How 5 Chatbots Deal with same Question
I Asked the Same Question to 5 Different AI Chatbots: “2024 US Election Results”
The purpose of my blog is to explore how well different AI chatbots handle real-time information, especially when it comes to current events or sensitive topics. You want to see if these chatbots can provide accurate and up-to-date information, and how they are different to each other in terms of their capabilities.
The “2024 US election results” are a significant event that captures global attention. It’s a question that will be on everyone’s mind, and the ability of AI chatbots to provide accurate and timely information about such a major event is crucial. This question was chosen because it highlights the chatbots’ ability to handle real-time information, a key aspect of their functionality. By comparing their responses, we can see how effectively they can keep up with current events and deliver information to users seeking the latest updates.
Overview of the AI Chatbots
AI chatbots have revolutionized the way we interact with technology, offering increasingly sophisticated and human-like conversational abilities. Several prominent AI chatbots have emerged, each with unique strengths and capabilities.
ChatGPT-4:
Developed by Open AI, ChatGPT-4 is a powerful language model known for its ability to generate human-quality text, translate languages, write different kinds of creative content, and answer your questions in an informative way.
ChatGPT-4: Known for its versatility, creativity, and ability to engage in complex conversations.
Gemini AI:
Google’s Gemini AI is a multimodal AI model capable of understanding and generating text, code, and images. It excels in various tasks, including translation, writing different kinds of creative content, and answering your questions in an informative way.
Gemini AI: Renowned for its multimodal capabilities and potential to revolutionize various industries.
Microsoft Copilot:
This AI assistant, integrated into Microsoft’s suite of products, is designed to help users with various tasks, from writing emails and documents to analyzing data and generating code.
Microsoft Copilot: Valued for its integration with Microsoft’s ecosystem and its ability to streamline workflows.
Aria:
Aria is an AI chatbot focused on providing information and completing tasks. It leverages advanced language models to understand and respond to user queries in a comprehensive and informative manner.
*Aria: Appreciated for its informative nature and its focus on providing comprehensive answers.
Perplexity AI:
This AI chatbot prioritizes accuracy and factual information. It is designed to provide reliable and up-to-date answers to user questions, often citing sources to support its responses.
Perplexity AI: Respected for its commitment to accuracy and its ability to provide reliable information.
Criteria for Evaluation
ChatGPT-4
- Response Quality
ChatGPT-4 generally exhibits high response quality, particularly in specialized domains such as healthcare. In a study evaluating its responses to specific medical cases, it achieved an average accuracy score of 4.9 out of 5 for diagnosis and treatment recommendations, indicating a strong capability to provide relevant and accurate information1. Another evaluation found that 84.2% of its responses were classified as high quality, with only a small percentage deemed low quality2. This suggests that ChatGPT-4 can effectively handle complex inquiries and provide detailed answers.
2. Tone and Clarity
The tone of ChatGPT-4’s responses is typically clear and professional. It employs a structured approach to answering questions, often using bullet points or numbered lists for clarity when appropriate. However, some users have reported inconsistencies in verbosity and detail compared to earlier versions like GPT-3.5; some responses are perceived as overly concise or lacking depth5. Readability assessments indicate that while the chatbot’s language is generally accessible, it often requires a college-level understanding to fully grasp the content.
3. Fact-Checking
In terms of fact-checking, ChatGPT-4 has demonstrated a commendable ability to provide accurate information across various topics. Studies have indicated that no misleading information was found in its responses during evaluations12. However, anecdotal reports suggest that some users have experienced a decline in the chatbot’s logical reasoning capabilities over time, leading to occasional inaccuracies in complex scenarios or nuanced discussions45. This raises concerns about the reliability of its outputs in more intricate contexts.
4. Additional Features
ChatGPT-4 offers several additional features that enhance its utility:
Contextual Understanding: The model can maintain context over longer conversations, though some users report it occasionally loses track of details during extended interactions.
Multi-domain Expertise: It has been successfully applied in diverse fields such as healthcare and education, providing tailored responses based on specific queries.
Feedback Mechanism: Users can provide feedback on responses (e.g., thumbs up/down), which helps improve future interactions by refining the model’s understanding of user expectations.
Readability Metrics: Evaluations using various readability tools show that while the language used is sophisticated, it often aligns with higher education levels, which may limit accessibility for some users
Gemini AI
- Response Quality
Gemini AI has made strides in providing accurate and comprehensive responses. The latest updates have focused on enhancing the model’s ability to handle complex queries, especially in mathematics and detailed instructions. The introduction of the chat-optimized version 1.5 Pro-002 has resulted in better performance and accuracy for user prompts1.
In comparative analyses, Gemini has been noted to perform on par with or even outperform other chatbots like ChatGPT in certain areas, such as product recommendations and handling factual inquiries. However, it has historically struggled with “hallucination” issues — instances where the AI generates incorrect or nonsensical information. Recent updates have reportedly reduced these occurrences, making Gemini a more reliable option for users seeking factual information.
2. Tone and Clarity
The tone of Gemini AI is generally professional and clear, aimed at providing user-friendly interactions. It tends to exhibit a more positive sentiment compared to competitors like ChatGPT, which has been noted for its more serious tone. This positive emotional tone may enhance user engagement and satisfaction. However, some users have reported that while Gemini is agreeable, it can come across as lacking assertiveness or authority in its responses.
3. Fact-Checking
Gemini AI’s fact-checking capabilities have improved with recent updates. The model is designed to provide up-to-date information, particularly in response to user queries about current events or specific topics. However, it still faces challenges in areas requiring nuanced understanding or controversial subjects; for instance, it has been criticized for avoiding political discussions entirely. This cautious approach may limit its utility for users seeking comprehensive insights into sensitive topics.
4. Additional Features
Gemini AI offers several additional features that enhance its functionality:
Image Generation: With the integration of Imagen 3, users can create images from text prompts, adding a visual dimension to interactions that is not available in many competing chatbots.
Token Limit: The Gemini Advanced version supports a significantly higher token limit (up to 2 million tokens) compared to ChatGPT’s 64,000 tokens, allowing for more extensive data input and conversation context.
Integration with Google Workspace: Gemini can streamline customer service tasks across Google applications by automating responses and summarizing interactions, which can reduce agent burnout and improve customer satisfaction.
Continuous Learning: The chatbot adapts over time based on user interactions and feedback, enhancing its knowledge base and response accuracy through ongoing training.
Microsoft Copilot
- Response Quality
Microsoft Copilot excels in generating contextually relevant content and automating tasks. It can:
Generate Content: Copilot can create articles, summaries, and presentations based on user prompts, adapting to different contexts and user preferences.
Support Decision-Making: It assists in data analysis and project planning by providing insights based on user data and historical interactions.
Enhance User Experience: By learning from user interactions, Copilot tailors its responses over time, improving relevance and personalization.
The chatbot’s ability to summarize information and suggest next steps in workflows further enhances its utility, making it a versatile tool for both individual users and organizations.
2. Tone and Clarity
The tone of Microsoft Copilot is professional yet approachable. It aims to provide clear, concise responses while maintaining an engaging conversational style. The chatbot offers three distinct conversation styles:
Precise: Short answers for quick queries.
Creative: Detailed responses suitable for brainstorming.
Balanced: A middle ground that provides informative yet concise answers2.
This flexibility allows users to select the interaction style that best suits their needs, contributing to a positive user experience.
3. Fact-Checking
Microsoft Copilot is built on robust AI models that ensure the accuracy of the information provided. The system employs grounding techniques to verify that responses are relevant to the specific context of the user’s request. Additionally, it adheres to privacy guidelines while generating content, ensuring compliance with organizational standards. The integration with Microsoft Graph allows Copilot to access a wide range of data sources, enhancing its ability to deliver accurate information tailored to each user’s role and permissions.
4. Additional Features
Copilot offers several advanced features that enhance its functionality:
Integration Across Microsoft Services: It connects with various Microsoft applications like Word, Excel, PowerPoint, and Teams, allowing for a cohesive user experience across platforms.
Continuous Learning: The chatbot adapts over time by learning from user interactions, which helps in refining its suggestions and improving overall effectiveness.
Future Enhancements: Upcoming features include enhanced multilingual support, advanced analytics capabilities for user interaction insights, and greater autonomy in decision-making tasks.
User Empowerment: By enabling subject matter experts to create and manage their own chatbots without technical intermediaries, Copilot lowers the barrier to entry for businesses looking to implement AI solutions.
Aria
- Response Quality
Aria’s responses have been evaluated for their accuracy and comprehensiveness. In a comparative study involving several AI chatbots, Aria was assessed alongside ChatGPT, Bard, Bing, and Claude 2. The findings indicated that while Aria demonstrated proficiency in understanding and generating responses, it lagged behind some competitors in factual accuracy. In particular, it received notably lower scores in generating original scientific content compared to others like ChatGPT-4 and Bing. This suggests that while Aria can effectively piece together existing knowledge, it may not consistently deliver the depth or originality expected in scholarly contexts.
2. Tone and Clarity
The tone of Aria’s responses is generally clear and professional. It adheres to conversational norms that make interactions intuitive for users. However, the clarity can vary depending on the complexity of the query posed to the chatbot. In user testing scenarios, Aria has shown a capacity for maintaining context within conversations, which enhances user experience by making interactions feel more natural.
3. Fact-Checking
Aria’s performance in providing accurate and up-to-date information has been mixed. While it can access a wide range of data and respond to inquiries effectively, its factual accuracy has been called into question in certain evaluations. For instance, in studies assessing factual correctness akin to grading students, Aria did not perform as well as leading models like ChatGPT-4. This indicates that while Aria is capable of generating relevant responses, users should be cautious regarding the reliability of the information provided.
4. Additional Features
Aria incorporates several additional features that enhance its usability:
Contextual Understanding: It can maintain context across multiple exchanges in a conversation, which is crucial for user engagement.
Modular Evaluation Environment: As part of the NIST ARIA initiative (Assessing Risks and Impacts of AI), Aria is evaluated through a structured environment that includes model testing, red-teaming, and field testing. This comprehensive evaluation framework aims to assess both technical performance and contextual robustness.
Focus on Accessibility: Considerations for accessibility are integrated into its design, ensuring that it can serve a diverse user base effectively. This includes being mindful of screen reader compatibility and providing clear navigational cues.
Perplexity AI
- Response Quality
Perplexity AI prioritizes accuracy and factual integrity in its responses. It pulls real-time data from various sources, including academic databases and news outlets, ensuring that users receive well-cited answers. This capability is particularly beneficial for users seeking precise information for academic or professional purposes. The chatbot’s design allows it to maintain context through follow-up questions, enhancing the clarity and relevance of its responses. However, some users have reported inconsistencies in response quality over time, especially with the Pro version, where certain prompts yielded lower quality outputs compared to previous interactions.
2. Tone and Clarity
The tone of Perplexity AI is generally clear and professional, aiming to deliver information in an accessible manner. Its user interface resembles that of ChatGPT but includes features that allow for direct sourcing of information, which enhances the clarity of responses by providing context through links to original content. This focus on clarity makes it a reliable tool for users who require straightforward answers without ambiguity.
3. Fact-Checking
Perplexity AI excels in fact-checking by integrating real-time data retrieval capabilities. Unlike static models such as ChatGPT, which rely on pre-existing knowledge up until a certain date, Perplexity continuously updates its database with the latest information from the web . This feature is crucial for tasks that require current insights, such as checking stock prices or following news events. However, there are instances where users have noted that the chatbot can “hallucinate” or generate inaccurate information despite its emphasis on sourcing from credible references.
4. Additional Features
Perplexity AI offers several additional features that enhance its usability:
Integration with Multiple LLMs: Users can switch between different models (e.g., Claude, GPT-4o) depending on their needs, allowing for tailored responses based on the complexity of queries.
Real-Time Information Access: By pulling data from various online sources, Perplexity provides up-to-date answers that are essential for research and decision-making tasks.
User-Centric Design: The interface allows easy navigation and interaction, making it suitable for both casual users and professionals seeking in-depth research assistance.
Responses from Each Chatbot
ChatGPT-4
Gemini AI
Microsoft Copilot
Aria
Perplexity AI
Comparison between all 5 different chatbot
Conclusion
Curious about which AI chatbot is the best at delivering timely, reliable information on major events like the “2024 US Election Results”? My latest blog explores this by comparing five leading AI chatbots: ChatGPT-4, Gemini AI, Microsoft Copilot, Aria, and Perplexity AI. Each bot is assessed on key factors such as response quality, fact-checking, tone, and additional features, showcasing their strengths and weaknesses when dealing with real-time, impactful news. By putting the same question to each bot, I aim to uncover how well these AI tools meet user expectations for accuracy, depth, and usability.
From professional, data-focused Microsoft Copilot to Perplexity’s up-to-the-minute facts, each AI brings something unique to the table. If you’re looking for a chatbot tailored to specific tasks — whether it’s handling sensitive topics, delivering general information, or providing a creative twist — this comparison provides insights to help you pick the right AI assistant for your needs. Dive into the blog for a comprehensive look at each chatbot’s performance and discover which one stands out as the top choice for real-time updates and reliability.
Note:
This blog is intended to provide readers with an informational overview of various AI chatbots and their responses to the question “2024 US election results.” The opinions expressed are based on my personal observations and comparisons of these AI tools, and are meant to offer insight into how different chatbots handle current events. This blog does not endorse any particular chatbot as the definitive source of information, nor should it be considered a substitute for professional advice or official information sources.
Boost now with coffee
